Brief One-page document to paste into a proposal
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 1
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.1.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.1.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.2.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.2.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.5
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.5.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.5.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 1.5.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 2
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.3.a
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.3.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.3.c
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.3.d
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.5
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.6
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.6.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.d
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.e
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.7.f
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.8
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.8.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.8.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.9
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.9.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.9.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.10
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.10.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.10.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 2.10.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 3
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for victim safety. HARK is a screen for identifying partner violence, not a measure of change, and the other candidates need permission that was not confirmed. The funder's own item or a partner record is the substitute. Source
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for victim safety. HARK is a screen for identifying partner violence, not a measure of change, and the other candidates need permission that was not confirmed. The funder's own item or a partner record is the substitute. Source
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.2.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.2.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for victim safety. HARK is a screen for identifying partner violence, not a measure of change, and the other candidates need permission that was not confirmed. The funder's own item or a partner record is the substitute. Source
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.5
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.5.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 3.5.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 4
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.3.a
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.5
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.5.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.5.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.5.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.5.d
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.6
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.6.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.6.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.6.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 4.6.d
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 5
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.1.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 5.5
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 6
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.2
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.2.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.2.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.2.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.4.a
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 6.4.b
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardOutcome 7
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.1
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.2
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.3
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.4
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5.a
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5.b
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5.c
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5.d
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.5.e
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
MenuoutcomeFY2022 application cycle onwardNo. 7.6
A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.
Results are attainment: actual divided by the promised value, for rows where the source gives both. Medians mix every measure a program reports; the measure pages split them.
Results by kind of promised value: 2 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Center for Ecoliteracy · SCBGP 2016 agreement SCB16010
Sales increased from 2016 baseline to 110 percent and by 10 percent as result of marketing and/or promotion activities. The following fruits and vegetables were tracked by lead school districts in each region: avocado, carrot, cucumber, grape, melon, peach, squash, strawberry, and tomato. (Natomas USD)
10% → 47% (470% of target) · %
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Ecoliteracy | SCBGP 2016 agreement SCB16010 | Sales increased from 2016 baseline to 110 percent and by 10 percent as result of marketing and/or promotion activities. The following fruits and vegetables were tracked by lead school districts in each region: avocado, carrot, cucumber, grape, melon, peach, squash, strawberry, and tomato. (Natomas USD) | 10% | 47% | % | 470% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 2 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Cheyenne River Youth Project · 9/30/2019 to 9/29/2022
40 teens will complete Food Sovereignty internships.
40 → 98 (245% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheyenne River Youth Project | 9/30/2019 to 9/29/2022 | 40 teens will complete Food Sovereignty internships. | 40 | 98 | count | 245% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 2 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
County of San Joaquin · SCBGP 2011 agreement SCB11003
Participating students will increase their knowledge of San Joaquin County specialty crops and nutrition in relation to healthy living by an increase of 10%, as measured by pre/post field day tests. (No baseline existed for this measure)
10% → 14% (140% of target) · %
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of San Joaquin | SCBGP 2011 agreement SCB11003 | Participating students will increase their knowledge of San Joaquin County specialty crops and nutrition in relation to healthy living by an increase of 10%, as measured by pre/post field day tests. (No baseline existed for this measure) | 10% | 14% | % | 140% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 12 with a target printed beside the result. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Agriculture Marketing Service - Research and Promotion Programs · 2007
Average number of days to approve program/budget.
8.0 → 9.6 (120% of target)
Source document| Reporting entity | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture Marketing Service - Research and Promotion Programs | 2007 | Average number of days to approve program/budget. | 8.0 | 9.6 | 120% | document |
Each item comes from one funder, one program or one department; none is a government-wide rule.
Showing clauses from USDA. All clauses
Paraphrase
Yearly targets may be written as percentage-point change when the baseline value is not known.
It lets you write: Write each year's target as a percentage-point change from a baseline you will measure.
Source document, 2025