Brief One-page document to paste into a proposal
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-1
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 100 Percent of approved /funded service slots were available at any given time throughout the year.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-2
A share computed from the organization’s own records.
Program Performance Standard: 80 Percent of youth will have a completed Safety Assessment.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-3
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 95 Percent of youth with a completed safety assessment that required immediate attention will have an Emergency Care Plan implemented.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-4
A share computed from the organization’s own records.
Program Performance Standard: 70 Percent of youth will have a completed Casey Assessment. (Excludes Outreach Brief Contacts.)
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-5
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 90 Percent of youth with a completed Casey Assessment will have a Case Management Plan developed.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-6
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 90 Percent of youth will have a Case Management Plan Implemented. (Considers only youth with a case plan developed. Considers those with the case plan 50% or more completed upon exit)
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-7
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 90 Percent of Case Management Plans will include strategies to encourage employment and/or education (High School, GED, Vocational etc.)
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-8
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 90 Percent of Case Management Plans will include the strategies to increase life skills.
RequiredoutcomeFY2026HY-9
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for housing stability. The funder's own item (SAMHSA SUPRT-C client form, item A2d), an HMIS exit destination, or a partner record is the substitute. Source
Program Performance Standard: 70 Percent of Emergency Shelter Youth will exit the program to stable housing.
RequiredoutcomeFY2026HY-10
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for housing stability. The funder's own item (SAMHSA SUPRT-C client form, item A2d), an HMIS exit destination, or a partner record is the substitute. Source
Program Performance Standard: 80 Percent of Transitional Living Youth will exit the program to stable housing.
RequiredoutcomeFY2026HY-11
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
Program Performance Standard: 80 Percent of Transitional Living Youth will exit the program employed and/or enrolled in educational program.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-12
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 95 Percent of pregnant youth will receive prenatal care.
RequiredoutputFY2026HY-13
An output the funder classes as a count of activity.
Program Performance Standard: 95 Percent of parenting Transitional Living Youth will receive parenting skills education.
RequiredoutcomeFY2026HY-14
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
Program Performance Standard: 65 Percent of eligible youth will acquire one or more new mainstream benefits (SSI, Medicaid, TANF, SNAP, WIC).
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
The measures are the number of clients active in the report date range along with their average and median length of time experiencing homelessness across the relevant universe of projects. This includes time experiencing homelessness during the report date range as well as prior to the report start date. Measure 1a This measure uses each client’s start, exit, and bed night dates strictly as entered in HMIS, going…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
The measures are the number of clients active in the report date range along with their average and median length of time experiencing homelessness across the relevant universe of projects. This includes time experiencing homelessness during the report date range as well as prior to the report start date. Measure 1a This measure uses each client’s start, exit, and bed night dates strictly as entered in HMIS, going…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for housing stability. The funder's own item (SAMHSA SUPRT-C client form, item A2d), an HMIS exit destination, or a partner record is the substitute. Source
This measure begins with clients who exited to a permanent housing destination in the date range two years prior to the report date range. Of those clients, the measure reports on how many of them returned to homelessness as indicated in HMIS for up to two years after their initial exit.
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 3.1
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
This measure is divided in two tables: 1. Metric 3.1 - Counts of clients using PIT count data. This data should be manually entered from the appropriate PIT count data previously submitted. Due to ever-changing data, it is often difficult or impossible to run the same query months later and return the same results. Thus, this metric is not intended to be programmed into the HMIS as part of the System Performance Me…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 3.2
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
This measure is divided in two tables: 1. Metric 3.1 - Counts of clients using PIT count data. This data should be manually entered from the appropriate PIT count data previously submitted. Due to ever-changing data, it is often difficult or impossible to run the same query months later and return the same results. Thus, this metric is not intended to be programmed into the HMIS as part of the System Performance Me…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.1
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.2
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.3
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.4
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.5
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 4.6
No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.
This measure is divided into six tables as shown above. The project types reported in these metrics are the same for all metrics, but the type of income and universe of clients differs. Equally important, the projects reported on are limited to CoC-funded projects, and only adult clients are included. For system stayers (metrics 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) 1. A “system stayer” is an adult client active in any one or more of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 5.1
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
This measure is divided in two tables: 1. Metric 5.1 – Clients entering in Emergency Shelter – Entry Exit, Emergency Shelter – Night-by-Night, Safe Haven, and Transitional Housing. 2. Metric 5.2 – Clients entering in Emergency Shelter – Entry Exit, Emergency Shelter – Night-by-Night, Safe Haven, Transitional Housing, and Permanent Housing. For both measures, start with the client’s earliest start date in any of the…
Program-wideoutcomeFY2026No. 5.2
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
This measure is divided in two tables: 1. Metric 5.1 – Clients entering in Emergency Shelter – Entry Exit, Emergency Shelter – Night-by-Night, Safe Haven, and Transitional Housing. 2. Metric 5.2 – Clients entering in Emergency Shelter – Entry Exit, Emergency Shelter – Night-by-Night, Safe Haven, Transitional Housing, and Permanent Housing. For both measures, start with the client’s earliest start date in any of the…
Program-wideoutcomeFY20266a.1 and 6b.1
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for housing stability. The funder's own item (SAMHSA SUPRT-C client form, item A2d), an HMIS exit destination, or a partner record is the substitute. Source
Metrics 6a.1 and 6b.1 mirror Measure 2 but with a universe of Category 3 persons. Metric 6c.1 mirrors Measure 7b.1 but with a universe of Category 3 SH, TH, PH – RRH, and PH (without a housing move-in date as defined by the Handling Housing Move-In Dates section of the HMIS Standard Reporting Terminology Glossary) system leavers in the current reporting year. Metric 6c.2 mirrors Measure 7b.2 but with a universe of…
Program-wideoutcomeFY20266c.1
The outcome sits in a record another agency holds.
No cleared, validated, free outcome instrument exists for housing stability. The funder's own item (SAMHSA SUPRT-C client form, item A2d), an HMIS exit destination, or a partner record is the substitute. Source
Metrics 6a.1 and 6b.1 mirror Measure 2 but with a universe of Category 3 persons. Metric 6c.1 mirrors Measure 7b.1 but with a universe of Category 3 SH, TH, PH – RRH, and PH (without a housing move-in date as defined by the Handling Housing Move-In Dates section of the HMIS Standard Reporting Terminology Glossary) system leavers in the current reporting year. Metric 6c.2 mirrors Measure 7b.2 but with a universe of…
Results are attainment: actual divided by the promised value, for rows where the source gives both. Medians mix every measure a program reports; the measure pages split them.
Results by kind of promised value: 3 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
HOPE South Florida · FY2024-25
Percentage of participants placed in approved shelter/housing options
25% → 56% (224% of target) · %
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOPE South Florida | FY2024-25 | Percentage of participants placed in approved shelter/housing options | 25% | 56% | % | 224% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 3 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
HOPE South Florida Homeless Support · FY2021-22
Participants placed in approved shelter/housing options.
25% → 8% (32% of target) · %
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOPE South Florida Homeless Support | FY2021-22 | Participants placed in approved shelter/housing options. | 25% | 8% | % | 32% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 1 with a target printed beside the result.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Community Action Stops Abuse, Inc. · FY2024
Participants served (target vs actual)
870 → 1257 (144% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Action Stops Abuse, Inc. | FY2024 | Participants served (target vs actual) | 870 | 1257 | count | 144% | document |
This source lists 3 rows for this program but none carries both a target and a result, so no attainment is computed.
This source lists 3 rows for this program but none carries both a target and a result, so no attainment is computed.
Results by kind of promised value: 69 with a target printed beside the result; 63 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Department of Veterans' Affairs · FY2024
Total number of veterans impacted with supplemental support services (advocacy and after-care follow-up)
15.0 → 9.0 (60% of target) · count
Source document| Reporting entity | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Veterans' Affairs | FY2024 | Total number of veterans impacted with supplemental support services (advocacy and after-care follow-up) | 15.0 | 9.0 | count | 60% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 22 with a target printed beside the result; 20 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Department of Veterans' Affairs · FY2015
Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)
$ 1,011.9 → $ 165.2 (16% of target) · $
Source document| Reporting entity | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Veterans' Affairs | FY2015 | Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands) | $ 1,011.9 | $ 165.2 | $ | 16% | document |
Results by kind of promised value: 21 with a target printed beside the result. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)
1 shown
Homeless Assistance Grants (Competitive) · 2007
The percentage of homeless persons who have moved from HUD transitional housing into permanent housing will be 65 percent in 2009, and will increase each year.
61.5% → 66.6% (108% of target) · %
Source document| Reporting entity | Period | Measure | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homeless Assistance Grants (Competitive) | 2007 | The percentage of homeless persons who have moved from HUD transitional housing into permanent housing will be 65 percent in 2009, and will increase each year. | 61.5% | 66.6% | % | 108% | document |
Each item comes from one funder, one program or one department; none is a government-wide rule.
No target-setting clause from Illinois Department of Human Services and HUD in the library yet; the items below are the nearest precedent. All clauses
Quote
“you may enter a '0' and then TBD for targets in the work plan”
It lets you write: Enter 0 as the target, mark it TBD, and commit to revising it within six months.
Source document, 2023Paraphrase
An applicant that lacks a baseline explains how and when it will establish one.
It lets you write: State that no baseline exists yet, and say how and by when you will establish it.
Source document, 2024Paraphrase
Targets for program years 3 and 4 are negotiated before the third program year and adjusted by DOL's model.
It lets you write: Propose years 1-2 targets now and state that years 3-4 will be negotiated before year 3.
Source documentQuote
“grantees can revise annual goals in consultation with their GPO during the first quarter of each fiscal year”
It lets you write: Set annual goals and state that you will revise them with your project officer in each year's first quarter.
Source document, 2022Quote
“target setting will be an iterative process throughout implementation as more performance data is available”
It lets you write: Describe target setting as iterative, with targets reset as performance data arrives.
Source document, 2025Paraphrase
Baseline estimates are confirmed or updated within six months of award.
It lets you write: Give a baseline estimate and commit to confirming or updating it within six months of award.
Source document, 2026Quote
“if a grantee wishes to negotiate their performance targets”
It lets you write: Request negotiation of a performance target and give the reason.
Source document, 2022Paraphrase
Future-year milestones may be renegotiated based on prior-year data.
It lets you write: List milestones for year 1 and state that later-year milestones will be renegotiated from year-1 data.
Source document, 2025Paraphrase
A baseline assessment is done after award, and targets are set from it.
It lets you write: Plan a post-award baseline assessment and set the targets from its results.
Source document, 2026Quote
“confirm or request adjustment to their patient target by the deadline in their email”
It lets you write: Existing awardees can ask for an adjusted patient target during the renewal process.
Source document, 2022