Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Disaster recovery housing

Brief One-page document to paste into a proposal

Switch program type

What funders require

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (CDBG-DR, reported through DRGR)

CDBG-DR 2001 World Trade Center23 measures
Show all 23 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2005 Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma41 measures
Show all 41 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2008 Hurricane Ike and Other Events33 measures
Show all 33 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2008 Midwest Floods20 measures
Show all 20 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2010 Severe Storms and Flooding13 measures
CDBG-DR 2011 Multiple Disasters39 measures
Show all 39 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2011-2013 Hurricane Sandy and Other Events55 measures
Show all 55 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2013 National Disaster Resilience216 measures
Show all 216 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2015 Hurricane Joaquin and Patricia and Other Events21 measures
Show all 21 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2015-2018 Mitigation95 measures
Show all 95 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2016 Louisiana Floods and Other Events31 measures
Show all 31 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2017 Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria39 measures
Show all 39 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2018 Disasters37 measures
Show all 37 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2019 Disasters38 measures
Show all 38 measures for this program
CDBG-DR 2020 Hurricanes Laura, Delta and Zeta (LDZ)/2021 Hurricane Ida and Wildfires (IDF)25 measures
Show all 25 measures for this program

How grantees did

Results are attainment: actual divided by the promised value, for rows where the source gives both. Medians mix every measure a program reports; the measure pages split them.

CDBG-DR 2008 Hurricane Ike and Other Events

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
1,403grantees
51measures
1period
15,402results
100%median of target (16% to 100%)
64%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 15,402 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Town of Waterproof · as of 2026-10-20

    # of public facilities [Total]

    3 → 9 (300% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Southeast Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC) · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Total]

    100 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • City of Rushville · as of 2026-10-20

    # Owner Households [Low income]

    1 → 1 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Cedar Rapids · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    23777 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Des Moines County · as of 2026-10-20

    Activity funds eligible for DREF (Ike Only) [Total]

    35397 → 35397 (100% of target) · $

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Town of Waterproofas of 2026-10-20# of public facilities [Total]39count300%document
Southeast Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC)as of 2026-10-20# of Households [Total]1000count0%document
City of Rushvilleas of 2026-10-20# Owner Households [Low income]11count100%document
Cedar Rapidsas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]237770count0%document
Des Moines Countyas of 2026-10-20Activity funds eligible for DREF (Ike Only) [Total]3539735397$100%document

CDBG-DR 2011-2013 Hurricane Sandy and Other Events

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
633grantees
71measures
1period
11,361results
0%median of target (0% to 100%)
41%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 11,361 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Town of Hardenburgh · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    65 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • New Brunswick City · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Properties [Total]

    2 → 2 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Garrett County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Total]

    167 → 91 (54% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Palo Park Community, LLLP · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Multifamily Units [Total]

    18 → 18 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Town of Oyster Bay · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Total]

    58885 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Town of Hardenburghas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]650count0%document
New Brunswick Cityas of 2026-10-20# of Properties [Total]22count100%document
Garrett Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Total]16791count54%document
Palo Park Community, LLLPas of 2026-10-20# of Multifamily Units [Total]1818count100%document
Town of Oyster Bayas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Total]588850count0%document

CDBG-DR 2005 Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
378grantees
57measures
1period
5,285results
100%median of target (0% to 106%)
60%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 5,285 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Cypress Manor I, LP · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Low income]

    11 → 22 (200% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Village Place Apartments · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Low income]

    24 → 20 (83% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Southern States Housing Group, LLC. · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Mod income]

    5 → 5 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Newhaven Court, LLC · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Properties [Total]

    1 → 1 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • On Iberville Phase I, LLC · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    22 → 44 (200% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Cypress Manor I, LPas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Low income]1122count200%document
Village Place Apartmentsas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Low income]2420count83%document
Southern States Housing Group, LLC.as of 2026-10-20# of Households [Mod income]55count100%document
Newhaven Court, LLCas of 2026-10-20# of Properties [Total]11count100%document
On Iberville Phase I, LLCas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]2244count200%document

CDBG-DR 2017 Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
262grantees
55measures
1period
4,099results
0%median of target (0% to 0%)
7%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 4,099 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Edgewater · as of 2026-10-20

    # of public facilities [Total]

    1 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Port Lavaca · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Low income]

    300 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Jasper County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    156 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Wharton, County of · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    64 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Victoria County · as of 2026-10-20

    # Owner Households [Mod income]

    3 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Edgewateras of 2026-10-20# of public facilities [Total]10count0%document
Port Lavacaas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Low income]3000count0%document
Jasper Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]1560count0%document
Wharton, County ofas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]640count0%document
Victoria Countyas of 2026-10-20# Owner Households [Mod income]30count0%document

CDBG-DR 2015-2018 Mitigation

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
343grantees
104measures
1period
2,817results
0%median of target (0% to 0%)
4%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 2,817 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • SPENCER, CITY OF · as of 2026-10-20

    % reduction of sanitary sewer overflows [Total]

    100 → 0 (0% of target) · %

    Source document
  • Edgewater · as of 2026-10-20

    # of public facilities [Total]

    1 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Kirbyville · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Targeted Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]

    1 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Vidor · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]

    1 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • REGION 4 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL · as of 2026-10-20

    # of community engagement meetings/events [Total]

    2 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
SPENCER, CITY OFas of 2026-10-20% reduction of sanitary sewer overflows [Total]1000%0%document
Edgewateras of 2026-10-20# of public facilities [Total]10count0%document
Kirbyvilleas of 2026-10-20# of Targeted Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]10count0%document
Vidoras of 2026-10-20# of Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]10count0%document
REGION 4 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCILas of 2026-10-20# of community engagement meetings/events [Total]20count0%document

CDBG-DR 2011 Multiple Disasters

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
142grantees
51measures
1period
2,426results
0%median of target (0% to 100%)
33%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 2,426 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Town of Catskill · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    6547 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Lackawanna County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]

    80 → 60 (75% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Village of Owego · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Low income]

    860 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Town of Hackleburg · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Permanent Jobs Created [Low income]

    13 → 13 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Tuscaloosa Housing Authority · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Mod income]

    50 → 50 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Town of Catskillas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]65470count0%document
Lackawanna Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]8060count75%document
Village of Owegoas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Low income]8600count0%document
Town of Hackleburgas of 2026-10-20# of Permanent Jobs Created [Low income]1313count100%document
Tuscaloosa Housing Authorityas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Mod income]5050count100%document

CDBG-DR 2018 Disasters

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
88grantees
53measures
1period
1,305results
0%median of target (0% to 0%)
4%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 1,305 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Greenville, City of · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Housing Units [Total]

    180 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • State of California · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    112 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • City of Chico · as of 2026-10-20

    # ELI Households (0-30% AMI) [Total]

    37 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • North Carolina Housing Finance Agency · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Low income]

    29 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Department of Economic Opportunity · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Mod income]

    2046 → 62 (3% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Greenville, City ofas of 2026-10-20# of Housing Units [Total]1800count0%document
State of Californiaas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]1120count0%document
City of Chicoas of 2026-10-20# ELI Households (0-30% AMI) [Total]370count0%document
North Carolina Housing Finance Agencyas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Low income]290count0%document
Department of Economic Opportunityas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Mod income]204662count3%document

CDBG-DR 2016 Louisiana Floods and Other Events

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
90grantees
43measures
1period
1,276results
0%median of target (0% to 53%)
17%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 1,276 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Cross Plains, City of · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Total]

    4 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Jasper County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    227 → 227 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Harris, County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]

    13093 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • West Virginia Development Office · as of 2026-10-20

    # Owner Households [Total]

    15 → 15 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • North Carolina Housing Finance Agency · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Low income]

    22 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Cross Plains, City ofas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Total]40count0%document
Jasper Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]227227count100%document
Harris, Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]130930count0%document
West Virginia Development Officeas of 2026-10-20# Owner Households [Total]1515count100%document
North Carolina Housing Finance Agencyas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Low income]220count0%document

CDBG-DR 2008 Midwest Floods

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
137grantees
28measures
1period
1,220results
49%median of target (0% to 100%)
46%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 1,220 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Jasper County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    493 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Crawfordsville · as of 2026-10-20

    # of cable feet of public utility [Total]

    1000 → 1000 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Monroe County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    4567 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Elnora, Town of · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    428 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Ellettsville, Town of · as of 2026-10-20

    # of public facilities [Total]

    1 → 1 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Jasper Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]4930count0%document
Crawfordsvilleas of 2026-10-20# of cable feet of public utility [Total]10001000count100%document
Monroe Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]45670count0%document
Elnora, Town ofas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]4280count0%document
Ellettsville, Town ofas of 2026-10-20# of public facilities [Total]11count100%document

CDBG-DR 2013 National Disaster Resilience

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
38grantees
230measures
1period
892results
0%median of target (0% to 15%)
16%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 892 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • University of Memphis · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Website visits [Total]

    550 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • City of Minot · as of 2026-10-20

    # of acres of greenspace created [Total]

    630 → 85 (13% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Shelby County Government2 · as of 2026-10-20

    % increase in median property value of homes in project area [Total]

    3 → 0 (0% of target) · %

    Source document
  • Norfolk · as of 2026-10-20

    # of linear feet of trails constructed [Total]

    1000 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • West Tennessee River Basin Authority · as of 2026-10-20

    # linear feet of streams restored [Total]

    2500 → 13200 (528% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
University of Memphisas of 2026-10-20# of Website visits [Total]5500count0%document
City of Minotas of 2026-10-20# of acres of greenspace created [Total]63085count13%document
Shelby County Government2as of 2026-10-20% increase in median property value of homes in project area [Total]30%0%document
Norfolkas of 2026-10-20# of linear feet of trails constructed [Total]10000count0%document
West Tennessee River Basin Authorityas of 2026-10-20# linear feet of streams restored [Total]250013200count528%document

CDBG-DR 2019 Disasters

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
34grantees
46measures
1period
589results
0%median of target (0% to 2%)
6%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 589 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • City of Jefferson CIty · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    63 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Dodge County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Elevated Structures [Total]

    4 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Modale · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]

    1040 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • HOLT, COUNTY OF · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Properties [Total]

    2 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Oakland · as of 2026-10-20

    # Owner Households [Total]

    4 → 4 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
City of Jefferson CItyas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]630count0%document
Dodge Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Elevated Structures [Total]40count0%document
Modaleas of 2026-10-20# of Section 3 Labor Hours [Total]10400count0%document
HOLT, COUNTY OFas of 2026-10-20# of Properties [Total]20count0%document
Oaklandas of 2026-10-20# Owner Households [Total]44count100%document

CDBG-DR 2020 Hurricanes Laura, Delta and Zeta (LDZ)/2021 Hurricane Ida and Wildfires (IDF)

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
22grantees
41measures
1period
541results
0%median of target (0% to 0%)
0%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 541 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • State of California · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    216 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Louisiana Housing Corporation · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    750 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Properties [Total]

    20 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Town of Marion · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Total]

    20 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Linn County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Singlefamily Units [Total]

    10 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
State of Californiaas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]2160count0%document
Louisiana Housing Corporationas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]7500count0%document
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONas of 2026-10-20# of Properties [Total]200count0%document
Town of Marionas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Total]200count0%document
Linn Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Singlefamily Units [Total]100count0%document

CDBG-DR 2015 Hurricane Joaquin and Patricia and Other Events

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
45grantees
33measures
1period
514results
0%median of target (0% to 74%)
15%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 514 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Jasper County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Mod income]

    39 → 39 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Richland County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Low income]

    100 → 170 (170% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Harris, County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]

    3590 → 3590 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • City of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Plans or Planning Products [Total]

    3 → 3 (100% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Hubbard · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Households [Mod income]

    5 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Jasper Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Mod income]3939count100%document
Richland Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Low income]100170count170%document
Harris, Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Linear feet of Public Improvement [Total]35903590count100%document
City of San Marcosas of 2026-10-20# of Plans or Planning Products [Total]33count100%document
Hubbardas of 2026-10-20# of Households [Mod income]50count0%document

CDBG-DR 2001 World Trade Center

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
77grantees
27measures
1period
372results
0%median of target (0% to 100%)
38%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 372 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

5 shown

  • Lower Manhattan Development Corporation with agreements with the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation and the NYC Department of Small Business Services. · as of 2026-10-20

    # of public facilities [Total]

    1 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Tribeca Film Festival · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Total]

    16600 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • The Flea Theater · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Persons [Total]

    100000 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • New York City Economic Development Corporation · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Plans or Planning Products [Total]

    5 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • New York City Department of Small Business Services · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Businesses [Total]

    18 → 38 (211% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 5 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Lower Manhattan Development Corporation with agreements with the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation and the NYC Department of Small Business Services.as of 2026-10-20# of public facilities [Total]10count0%document
Tribeca Film Festivalas of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Total]166000count0%document
The Flea Theateras of 2026-10-20# of Persons [Total]1000000count0%document
New York City Economic Development Corporationas of 2026-10-20# of Plans or Planning Products [Total]50count0%document
New York City Department of Small Business Servicesas of 2026-10-20# of Businesses [Total]1838count211%document

CDBG-DR 2010 Severe Storms and Flooding

Grantee-level resultsHUD CDBG-DR performance by activity (DRGR)
4grantees
21measures
1period
372results
0%median of target (0% to 0%)
10%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 372 with a goal revised after the fact.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

4 shown

  • Nashville-Davidson Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Properties [Total]

    92 → 171 (186% of target) · count

    Source document
  • City of Warwick · as of 2026-10-20

    # Owner Households [Total]

    22 → 4 (18% of target) · count

    Source document
  • The Housing Fund · as of 2026-10-20

    # Renter Households [Mod income]

    15 → 0 (0% of target) · count

    Source document
  • Metropolitan Government Nashville Davidson County · as of 2026-10-20

    # of Singlefamily Units [Total]

    80 → 104 (130% of target) · count

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 4 shown
GranteePeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Nashville-Davidson Metropolitan Development and Housing Agencyas of 2026-10-20# of Properties [Total]92171count186%document
City of Warwickas of 2026-10-20# Owner Households [Total]224count18%document
The Housing Fundas of 2026-10-20# Renter Households [Mod income]150count0%document
Metropolitan Government Nashville Davidson Countyas of 2026-10-20# of Singlefamily Units [Total]80104count130%document

Disaster Recovery and Risk Reduction

Program-level summary, not granteesIllinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports
21measures
12periods
168results
96%median of target (68% to 100%)
37%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 91 with a target printed beside the result; 77 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

2 shown

  • Illinois Emergency Management Agency · FY2021

    Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)

    $ 923,861.8 → $ 605,669.9 (66% of target) · $

    Source document
  • Illinois Emergency Management Agency & Office of Homeland Security · FY2024

    Dollars disbursed to local governments to help recover from disasters (in thousands)

    $ 200,000.0 → $ 700,644.7 (350% of target) · $

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 2 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Illinois Emergency Management AgencyFY2021Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)$ 923,861.8$ 605,669.9$66%document
Illinois Emergency Management Agency & Office of Homeland SecurityFY2024Dollars disbursed to local governments to help recover from disasters (in thousands)$ 200,000.0$ 700,644.7$350%document

Disaster Assistance and Preparedness

Program-level summary, not granteesIllinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports
21measures
10periods
130results
100%median of target (96% to 100%)
66%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 73 with a target printed beside the result; 57 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

1 shown

  • Illinois Emergency Management Agency · FY2008

    Federally required "evaluation exercises" conduct with the utility, local government and other state agencies to demonstrate the ability to protect the public

    5.0 → 5.0 (100% of target)

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 1 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Illinois Emergency Management AgencyFY2008Federally required "evaluation exercises" conduct with the utility, local government and other state agencies to demonstrate the ability to protect the public5.05.0100%document

Hazard Management and Disaster Preparedness

Program-level summary, not granteesIllinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports
15measures
2periods
29results
102%median of target (84% to 150%)
59%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 22 with a target printed beside the result; 7 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

1 shown

  • Illinois Emergency Management Agency · FY2003

    Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)

    $ 70,719.0 → $ 22,176.6 (31% of target) · $

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 1 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Illinois Emergency Management AgencyFY2003Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)$ 70,719.0$ 22,176.6$31%document

Facilitate Disaster Recovery

Program-level summary, not granteesIllinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports
15measures
2periods
26results
100%median of target (50% to 111%)
69%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 19 with a target printed beside the result; 7 with a goal set before the period. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

1 shown

  • Illinois Emergency Management Agency · FY2003

    Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)

    $ 23,915.7 → $ 12,030.0 (50% of target) · $

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 1 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Illinois Emergency Management AgencyFY2003Total expenditures - all sources (in thousands)$ 23,915.7$ 12,030.0$50%document

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Response

Program-level summary, not granteesOMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)
9measures
4periods
24results
100%median of target (97% to 162%)
75%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 24 with a target printed beside the result. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

1 shown

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Response · 2007

    Number of highest-risk communities for which catastrophic plans have been completed per year.

    5 → 9 (180% of target)

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 1 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Response2007Number of highest-risk communities for which catastrophic plans have been completed per year.59180%document

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Recovery

Program-level summary, not granteesOMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)
4measures
4periods
12results
100%median of target (96% to 101%)
75%of results at or above target
0%target200%+

Results by kind of promised value: 12 with a target printed beside the result. These are agency-reported program figures, not individual grantees.

Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking)

1 shown

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Recovery · 2007

    Percentage completion (cumulative) of a catastrophic disaster recovery plan (focused solely on preliminary houseing strategy development)

    60% → 50% (83% of target) · %

    Source document
Example results (a fixed pick, not a ranking), 1 shown
Reporting entityPeriodMeasurePromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Recovery2007Percentage completion (cumulative) of a catastrophic disaster recovery plan (focused solely on preliminary houseing strategy development)60%50%%83%document

Target-setting language with precedent

Each item comes from one funder, one program or one department; none is a government-wide rule.

No target-setting clause from HUD in the library yet; the items below are the nearest precedent. All clauses

EDGAR, 34 CFR 75.110(c)

Paraphrase

An applicant that lacks a baseline explains how and when it will establish one.

It lets you write: State that no baseline exists yet, and say how and by when you will establish it.

Source document, 2024

NIH PAR-25-383, Section VI

Paraphrase

Future-year milestones may be renegotiated based on prior-year data.

It lets you write: List milestones for year 1 and state that later-year milestones will be renegotiated from year-1 data.

Source document, 2025