# of Permanent Jobs Retained
Requiredoutput
Tier 1: Collect today
A DRGR count entered from the grantee’s own project records.
- Instrument
- DRGR (Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System), CDBG-DR Performance by Activity
- Target
- No target rule stated
Match / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (CDBG-DR, reported through DRGR) / CDBG-DR 2015 Hurricane Joaquin and Patricia and Other Events
Requiredoutput
A DRGR count entered from the grantee’s own project records.
33 paired precedent measures, first 8 shown, closest first. Pairing basis is shown on each.
Paired by name_equal. 2 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 2 | 2 | 1 | 90% | 45% to 135% | 50% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
2 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
10 → 18 (180% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
70 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentPaired by name_equal. 1 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
1 shown
Richland County · as of 2026-10-20
25 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 25 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 2 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
2 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
10 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
45 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentPaired by name_equal. 1 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
1 shown
Richland County · as of 2026-10-20
14 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 14 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 1 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
1 shown
Richland County · as of 2026-10-20
6 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 6 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 1 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
1 shown
Richland County · as of 2026-10-20
8 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 8 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 68 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 68 | 40 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 0% | 6% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
Austin · as of 2026-10-20
66460 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentBellaire · as of 2026-10-20
1245 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentBridgeport · as of 2026-10-20
5220 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentBuda · as of 2026-10-20
86 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentBuffalo · as of 2026-10-20
357 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
10 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
129272 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Housing and Community Development Department · as of 2026-10-20
11085 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Housing and Community Development Department · as of 2026-10-20
10710 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Kyle · as of 2026-10-20
12420 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin | as of 2026-10-20 | 66460 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Bellaire | as of 2026-10-20 | 1245 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Bridgeport | as of 2026-10-20 | 5220 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Buda | as of 2026-10-20 | 86 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Buffalo | as of 2026-10-20 | 357 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 10 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 129272 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department | as of 2026-10-20 | 11085 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department | as of 2026-10-20 | 10710 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Kyle | as of 2026-10-20 | 12420 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 14 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 14 | 5 | 1 | 86% | 22% to 95% | 21% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
37 → 18 (49% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 8 (160% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 19 (90% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
11 → 10 (91% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos Texas · as of 2026-10-20
4 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
9 → 9 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
8 → 8 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
45 → 37 (82% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
46 → 44 (96% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 37 | 18 | count | 49% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 8 | count | 160% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 19 | count | 90% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 11 | 10 | count | 91% | document |
| City of San Marcos Texas | as of 2026-10-20 | 4 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 9 | 9 | count | 100% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 8 | 8 | count | 100% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 45 | 37 | count | 82% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 46 | 44 | count | 96% | document |