# of Multifamily Units
Requiredoutput
Tier 1: Collect today
A DRGR count entered from the grantee’s own project records.
- Instrument
- DRGR (Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System), CDBG-DR Performance by Activity
- Target
- No target rule stated
Match / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (CDBG-DR, reported through DRGR) / CDBG-DR 2015 Hurricane Joaquin and Patricia and Other Events
Requiredoutput
A DRGR count entered from the grantee’s own project records.
33 paired precedent measures, first 8 shown, closest first. Pairing basis is shown on each.
Paired by name_equal. 6 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 72% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
6 shown
Austin, City of · as of 2026-10-20
146 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
145 → 142 (98% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
100 → 96 (96% of target) · count
Source documentCorsicana · as of 2026-10-20
12 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentHubbard · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentWillacy County Housing Authority · as of 2026-10-20
62 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin, City of | as of 2026-10-20 | 146 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 145 | 142 | count | 98% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 100 | 96 | count | 96% | document |
| Corsicana | as of 2026-10-20 | 12 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Hubbard | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Willacy County Housing Authority | as of 2026-10-20 | 62 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 35 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 35 | 13 | 1 | 49% | 0% to 94% | 20% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 1 (50% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 2 (200% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
37 → 18 (49% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 8 (160% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 19 (90% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Housing and Community Development Department · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 33 (97% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
11 → 9 (82% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos Texas · as of 2026-10-20
4 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos Texas · as of 2026-10-20
4 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 1 | count | 50% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 2 | count | 200% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 37 | 18 | count | 49% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 8 | count | 160% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 19 | count | 90% | document |
| City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 33 | count | 97% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 11 | 9 | count | 82% | document |
| City of San Marcos Texas | as of 2026-10-20 | 4 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of San Marcos Texas | as of 2026-10-20 | 4 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 41 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 41 | 16 | 1 | 23% | 0% to 96% | 17% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
Austin, City of · as of 2026-10-20
146 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 1 (50% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 2 (200% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
37 → 18 (49% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 8 (160% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 19 (90% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
145 → 142 (98% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Housing and Community Development Department · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 33 (97% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
100 → 96 (96% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin, City of | as of 2026-10-20 | 146 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 1 | count | 50% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 2 | count | 200% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 37 | 18 | count | 49% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 8 | count | 160% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 19 | count | 90% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 145 | 142 | count | 98% | document |
| City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 33 | count | 97% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 100 | 96 | count | 96% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 4 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 4 | 3 | 1 | 35% | 0% to 77% | 0% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
4 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
100 → 96 (96% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
10 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
178 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 100 | 96 | count | 96% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 10 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 178 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 39 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 39 | 16 | 1 | 23% | 0% to 95% | 18% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
Austin, City of · as of 2026-10-20
146 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 1 (50% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 2 (200% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
37 → 18 (49% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 8 (160% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 19 (90% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
150 → 142 (95% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Housing and Community Development Department · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 33 (97% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
100 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin, City of | as of 2026-10-20 | 146 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 1 | count | 50% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 2 | count | 200% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 37 | 18 | count | 49% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 8 | count | 160% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 19 | count | 90% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 150 | 142 | count | 95% | document |
| City of Houston Housing and Community Development Department | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 33 | count | 97% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 100 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 5 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 5 | 2 | 1 | 92% | 92% to 95% | 20% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
5 shown
Harris County Flood District · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 20 (95% of target) · count
Source documentHarris County Flood District · as of 2026-10-20
6 → 6 (100% of target) · count
Source documentHarris County Flood District · as of 2026-10-20
13 → 12 (92% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
60 → 55 (92% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
15 → 2 (13% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris County Flood District | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 20 | count | 95% | document |
| Harris County Flood District | as of 2026-10-20 | 6 | 6 | count | 100% | document |
| Harris County Flood District | as of 2026-10-20 | 13 | 12 | count | 92% | document |
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 60 | 55 | count | 92% | document |
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 15 | 2 | count | 13% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 14 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 14 | 5 | 1 | 86% | 22% to 95% | 21% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
City of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
34 → 24 (71% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
37 → 18 (49% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
5 → 8 (160% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
21 → 19 (90% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos · as of 2026-10-20
11 → 10 (91% of target) · count
Source documentCity of San Marcos Texas · as of 2026-10-20
4 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
9 → 9 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
8 → 8 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
45 → 37 (82% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
46 → 44 (96% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 34 | 24 | count | 71% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 37 | 18 | count | 49% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 5 | 8 | count | 160% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 21 | 19 | count | 90% | document |
| City of San Marcos | as of 2026-10-20 | 11 | 10 | count | 91% | document |
| City of San Marcos Texas | as of 2026-10-20 | 4 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 9 | 9 | count | 100% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 8 | 8 | count | 100% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 45 | 37 | count | 82% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 46 | 44 | count | 96% | document |
Paired by name_equal. 11 rows in the source.
| Promised value is | Results | Grantees | Periods | Median | Middle half | At or above target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| goal revised after the fact | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0% | 0% to 100% | 36% |
Example rows (results with a target first)
10 shown
Austin · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentBridgeport · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 1 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Columbia · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentCity of Houston Public Works & Engineering · as of 2026-10-20
3 → 3 (100% of target) · count
Source documentCounty of Lexington · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentHarris, County · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 1 (100% of target) · count
Source documentHubbard · as of 2026-10-20
1 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentJewett · as of 2026-10-20
2 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source documentKirbyville · as of 2026-10-20
3 → 3 (100% of target) · count
Source documentRichland County · as of 2026-10-20
6 → 0 (0% of target) · count
Source document| Grantee | Period | Promised | Actual | Unit | % of target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Bridgeport | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 1 | count | 100% | document |
| City of Columbia | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| City of Houston Public Works & Engineering | as of 2026-10-20 | 3 | 3 | count | 100% | document |
| County of Lexington | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Harris, County | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 1 | count | 100% | document |
| Hubbard | as of 2026-10-20 | 1 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Jewett | as of 2026-10-20 | 2 | 0 | count | 0% | document |
| Kirbyville | as of 2026-10-20 | 3 | 3 | count | 100% | document |
| Richland County | as of 2026-10-20 | 6 | 0 | count | 0% | document |