Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / U.S. Department of Education / Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities (OSEP)

Measure 4015

The percentage of scholars who completed the preparation program and are employed in high-need districts.

Program-wideoutcomeMeasure 6

Tier 1: Collect todayTier 3: Needs a partner

The outcome sits in a record another agency holds. You hold the participant list and count it.

You count your own participants; the state wage record confirms the outcome.

Partner routes for wages and employment
  • CA: employment and quarterly earnings Held by Employment Development Department, UI wage records.
    Rule
    State-law authority or participant authorization; EDD offers DE 5600 authorization and a DSA process. Federal private-agent disclosure is permitted under 20 CFR 603.5(d), with safeguards and agreement requirements in 20 CFR 603.9 and 603.10.
    Lag
    EDD says wage abstracts are usually five months behind; a standard abstract covers up to five quarters.
    Cost
    Posted schedule: $1,500 administrative fee; $36 per quarter per SAFE account; $0.00121 per SSN per product; custom work additional. The schedule is labeled effective January 2023.
    Who may request
    Authorized third parties, including a nonprofit with sufficient authorization or statutory authority; not nonprofits automatically.
  • WA: employment and quarterly earnings Held by Employment Security Department.
    Rule
    20 CFR 603.5(d)-(f): informed-consent, public-official, or authorized contractor/agent route, as applicable; ESD eligibility and security review and contract.
    Lag
    State-specific event-to-delivery lag NR. Quarterly records; do not treat application acknowledgment as data availability.
    Cost
    Fixed tariff NR; federal 20 CFR 603.8 generally requires recovery of disclosure costs.
    Who may request
    Published categories include public officials, WorkSource partners, government-hired researchers, and private organizations or individuals using an informed-consent release.
  • National: SCSEP post-exit employment and earnings Held by State wage agencies; Kansas Department of Commerce and DOL through CRIS/SWIS.
    Rule
    SCSEP performance measures, 20 CFR 641.700-.710. CRIS matches national-program participant records against interstate wage data and returns aggregate employment outcomes through ETA.
    Lag
    CRIS-specific delivery lag NR. Measures concern employment in the second and fourth quarters after exit and second-quarter earnings; the observation period itself must elapse.
    Cost
    Per-request charge NR.
    Who may request
    Participating national-program grantees, including qualifying nonprofit SCSEP grantees; not arbitrary nonprofits.
Caveats
  • WIOA wage matching is a state obligation, not a subrecipient right. WIOA wage matching is a state performance obligation, not a blanket right for every subrecipient to receive raw wages. Under 20 CFR 677.175, states use quarterly wage records and facilitate matching consistent with law. DOL's reporting guidance anticipates roughly one to two quarters of wage-data availability delay: fourth-quarter-after-exit outcomes therefore require substantially more than a year from exit. UI records also omit some employment, including self-employment; supplemental evidence may be necessary. Source
Agreement templates
Instrument
OSEP Personnel Development Program Data Collection System (PDPDCS)
Target
No target rule stated
Source document, HTML section 'Program Performance Measures'

Grantee precedent for this measure

5 paired precedent measures. Pairing basis is shown on each.

Percentage of scholars who exit training programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result111170%170% to 170%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    1% → 1.7% (170% of target) · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    n/a → 1.3% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants20061%1.7%%170%document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005n/a1.3%%–document

Percentage of degree/certification recipients who are working in the area(s) for which they were trained upon program completion.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 5 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

5 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2002

    n/a → 55.4% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2003

    n/a → 57.8% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2004

    n/a → 62.8% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    n/a → 63.1% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    n/a → 59.1% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 5 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2002n/a55.4%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2003n/a57.8%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2004n/a62.8%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005n/a63.1%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006n/a59.1%%–document

Percentage of funds expended on scholars who drop out of programs because of: 1) poor academic performance; and 2) scholarship support being terminated when the federal grant to their institution ends.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2003

    n/a → 5% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    n/a → 0.29% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2003n/a5%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006n/a0.29%%–document

Percentage of projects that incorporate scientifically- or evidence-based practices.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    Baseline → 68% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    Baseline → 41.5% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005Baseline68%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006Baseline41.5%%–document

Percentage of scholars completing IDEA-funded training programs who are knowledgeable and skilled in scientifically- or evidence-based practices for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 1 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

1 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    Baseline → 91% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 1 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006Baseline91%%–document