Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Free instruments

Tier 2 measures ask for a reported change. Each instrument below has a form you can link to and a license sentence quoted from its publisher. Check the quote before you rely on it.

Cleared instruments, best rights class first 4

Brief Addiction Monitor, BAM (Continuous version)

Public domainLicense wording

“The BAM is in the public domain.”

The publisher or author says no permission is needed.

17 numbered; substance subitems within item 7 items5-10 min (estimated)

Substance use, recovery risks and resources

Scoring
Apply VA coding, then report Use, Risk and Protective composites separately. Continuous ranges: 0-90, 0-180, 0-180, respectively.
Named by funders
VA substance-use-disorder care.
Validity
Cacciola et al., 2013, J Substance Abuse Treatment 44:256-263; DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.013.
Caveat
EN verified. Use the continuous-version key; VA retired its categorical version. No overall "recovery total."

AUDIT

Free, with conditionsLicense wording

“No permission is needed for any non-commercial purpose.”

Free to use under stated conditions; read the quoted license before using it.

10 items3-5 min (estimated)

Alcohol-related risk/problems

Scoring
Official item coding yields 0-40; 8 or more is a commonly used screening threshold.
Named by funders
Washington State AMDG publishes the form.
Validity
Saunders et al., 1993, Addiction 88:791-804.
Caveat
EN; more than 40 translations listed. Preserve content, do not charge respondents, and identify it as WHO-approved. Standard past-year recall makes closely spaced pre/post comparisons difficult.

Substance Use Recovery Evaluator (SURE)

Free, with conditionsLicense wording

“use within not-for-profit charities or health care settings does not require a licence.”

Free to use under stated conditions; read the quoted license before using it.

21 scored, plus unscored priorities section items5-10 min (estimated)

Recovery and functioning

Scoring
Recode the five response options using the author's three-level key; total 21-63, higher = better recovery.
Named by funders
No US funder requirement verified.
Validity
Neale et al., 2016, development and validation; the owner identifies it as a psychometrically validated recovery outcome measure.
Caveat
EN verified. Distribution, commercial exploitation and electronic storage/transmission have separate restrictions. Particularly relevant to nonprofit paper administration; do not assume permission to embed it in your software.

AUDIT-C

Screening onlyLicense wording

“available for use in the public domain.”

Cleared for screening. It is not built to show change over time.

3 items1 min (estimated)

Alcohol consumption risk

Scoring
Sum 0-12. Original commonly used cutoffs: 4 or more for men; 3 or more for women.
Named by funders
Oregon Health Authority resource; NIDA-stewarded NIH common-data-element record.
Validity
Bush et al., 1998; Bradley et al., 2003, cited on the form.
Caveat
EN verified. Versions change the heavy-drinking threshold; retain the exact version and scoring rule.

Looks free, is not 15

Each of these circulates widely and carries a licensing restriction. The wording is quoted from the publisher's page.