Brief: Community action and anti-poverty

Prepared from Grant Precedent, 2026-10-23; data as of precedent 2026-10-21, measures 2026-10-22.

Measures funders require

Office of Community Services (HHS Administration for Children and Families), Community Services Block Grant (CSBG)

15 of 269 measures shown.

Number of jobs created to increase opportunities for people with low incomes in the identified community.

Code: CNPI 1a
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 34, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of job opportunities maintained in the identified community.

Code: CNPI 1b
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 34, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of “living wage ” jobs created in the identified community*.

Code: CNPI 1c
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 34, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of “living wage” jobs maintained in the identified community*.

Code: CNPI 1d
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 34, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of jobs created in the identified community with a benefit package.

Code: CNPI 1e
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 34, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Other Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z)

Code: CNPI 1z
Requirement: defined by the applicant
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Other Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z); top-level table 35, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Percent decrease of the unemployment rate.

Code: CNPI 1f
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Baseline existing starting point used for comparisons (%) | III.) Target (%) | IV.) Expected % change from baseline (Target % auto calculated) | V.) Actual Results (%) | VI.) Actual % change from baseline (% auto calculated) | VII.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 36, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Percent decrease of the youth unemployment rate.

Code: CNPI 1g
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Baseline existing starting point used for comparisons (%) | III.) Target (%) | IV.) Expected % change from baseline (Target % auto calculated) | V.) Actual Results (%) | VI.) Actual % change from baseline (% auto calculated) | VII.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 36, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Percent decrease of the underemployment rate.

Code: CNPI 1h
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Baseline existing starting point used for comparisons (%) | III.) Target (%) | IV.) Expected % change from baseline (Target % auto calculated) | V.) Actual Results (%) | VI.) Actual % change from baseline (% auto calculated) | VII.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1); top-level table 36, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Other Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z)

Code: CNPI 1z
Requirement: defined by the applicant
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Other Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z); top-level table 37, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of accessible and affordable early childhood or pre-school education assets or resources added to the identified community.

Code: CNPI 2a
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Education and Cognitive Development Indicators (CNPI 2); top-level table 38, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of accredited or licensed affordable child care facilities added in the identified community.

Code: CNPI 2b
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Education and Cognitive Development Indicators (CNPI 2); top-level table 38, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of new Early Childhood Screenings offered to children (ages 0-5) of families with low-incomes in the identified community.

Code: CNPI 2c
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Education and Cognitive Development Indicators (CNPI 2); top-level table 38, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of accessible and affordable education assets or resources added for school age children in the identified community. (e.g., academic, enrichment activities, before/after school care, summer programs)

Code: CNPI 2d
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Education and Cognitive Development Indicators (CNPI 2); top-level table 38, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

Number of accessible and affordable post secondary education assets or resources added for newly graduating youth in the identified community. (e.g. college tuition, scholarships, vocational training, etc.)

Code: CNPI 2e
Requirement: chosen from the funder's menu
Definition: I.) Identified Community (auto-populated) | II.) Target (#) | III.) Actual Results (#) | IV.) Performance target accuracy (% auto calculated)
Instrument: CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201)
Reporting frequency: annual (federal fiscal year)
Target rule: Applicant proposes the target
Source: HHS ACF performance measures, DOCX Community Level – Module 3 > Counts of Change for Education and Cognitive Development Indicators (CNPI 2); top-level table 38, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=171328201

What you can collect, and how

Tier 1 is collected today from your own records. Tier 2 needs one free instrument. Tier 3 needs a partner under a data agreement. A measure that matches no rule has no tier.

Tier 1: Collect today from your own records

Number of jobs created to increase opportunities for people with low incomes in the identified community.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of job opportunities maintained in the identified community.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of “living wage ” jobs created in the identified community*.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of “living wage” jobs maintained in the identified community*.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of jobs created in the identified community with a benefit package.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of accessible and affordable early childhood or pre-school education assets or resources added to the identified community.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of accredited or licensed affordable child care facilities added in the identified community.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of new Early Childhood Screenings offered to children (ages 0-5) of families with low-incomes in the identified community.

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of accessible and affordable education assets or resources added for school age children in the identified community. (e.g., academic, enrichment activities, before/after school care, summer programs)

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Number of accessible and affordable post secondary education assets or resources added for newly graduating youth in the identified community. (e.g. college tuition, scholarships, vocational training, etc.)

Collect today from your own records. A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Tier not determined

Other Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z)

Percent decrease of the unemployment rate.

Percent decrease of the youth unemployment rate.

Percent decrease of the underemployment rate.

Other Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z)

What grantees achieved

1 grantee of Economic Self-Sufficiency - Hunger - Summer BreakSpot reported 4 results against targets over 1 period; the median result was 127% of target (middle half 119% to 133%), and 100% met or exceeded the target. Source: Children's Services Council of Broward County, annual performance reports, https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf.

South Florida Hunger Coalition (FY2024-25): Percentage of children indicating that the Summer BreakSpot Project had a positive impact; promised 75%, actual 100% (133% of target); unit: %. Source: https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/APR-Book-FY-24-25.pdf

1 grantee of Economic Self-Sufficiency - Hunger - Mobile School Pantry reported 3 results against targets over 1 period; the median result was 109% of target (middle half 106% to 110%), and 100% met or exceeded the target. Source: Children's Services Council of Broward County, annual performance reports, https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf.

South Florida Hunger Coalition (FY2024-25): Percentage of families reporting satisfaction with service provided; promised 85%, actual 88% (104% of target); unit: %. Source: https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/APR-Book-FY-24-25.pdf

1 grantee of Economic Self-Sufficiency - Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA & EITC) reported 2 results against targets over 1 period; the median result was 117% of target (middle half 116% to 118%), and 100% met or exceeded the target. Source: Children's Services Council of Broward County, annual performance reports, https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf.

Hispanic Unity of Florida, Inc. (FY2024-25): Percentage of VITA clients reporting satisfaction with their overall experience; promised 80%, actual 95% (119% of target); unit: %. Source: https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/APR-Book-FY-24-25.pdf

1 grantee of Economic Self-Sufficiency – EITC – Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA & EITC) Program reported 2 results against targets over 1 period; the median result was 116% of target (middle half 115% to 116%), and 100% met or exceeded the target. Source: Children's Services Council of Broward County, annual performance reports, https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf.

Hispanic Unity (FY2023-24): Percentage of tax return submissions that were accepted: *Average refund amount was $1,354.14; promised 80%, actual 93% (116% of target); unit: %. Source: https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf

1 grantee of Economic Self-Sufficiency – Hunger reported 1 result against targets over 1 period; the median result was 106% of target (middle half 106% to 106%), and 100% met or exceeded the target. Source: Children's Services Council of Broward County, annual performance reports, https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf.

LifeNet4Families (FY2023-24): Percentage of families reporting satisfaction with services provided; promised 85%, actual 90% (106% of target); unit: %. Source: https://www.cscbroward.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/APR-FY-23-24-Book-002.pdf

Program-level figures, not individual grantees: Family and Community Services - Basic Family Supports reported 992 results against targets over 12 periods; the median result was 100% of target (middle half 89% to 111%), and 49% met or exceeded the target. Source: Illinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports, https://par.illinoiscomptroller.gov/index.cfm?AgencyNo=601&FiscalYear=2022&ProgramAreaGroupID=3&ProgramID=1&UniqueProgramID=6011.

Department of Human Services (FY2024): Percentage of TANF clients working and/or engaged in the required number of average countable activities per week; promised 57.00%, actual 45.00% (79% of target); unit: %. Source: https://par.illinoiscomptroller.gov/index.cfm?AgencyNo=444&FiscalYear=2024&ProgramAreaGroupID=1&ProgramID=9&UniqueProgramID=4449

Program-level figures, not individual grantees: Family and Community Services reported 128 results against targets over 2 periods; the median result was 101% of target (middle half 94% to 105%), and 65% met or exceeded the target. Source: Illinois Comptroller Public Accountability Reports, https://par.illinoiscomptroller.gov/index.cfm?AgencyNo=601&FiscalYear=2022&ProgramAreaGroupID=3&ProgramID=1&UniqueProgramID=6011.

Department of Human Services (FY2012): Timely disposition of MANG AABD applications; promised 80.00%, actual 80.50% (101% of target); unit: %. Source: https://par.illinoiscomptroller.gov/index.cfm?AgencyNo=444&FiscalYear=2012&ProgramAreaGroupID=1&ProgramID=9&UniqueProgramID=4449

Program-level figures, not individual grantees: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) reported 22 results against targets over 8 periods; the median result was 100% of target (middle half 97% to 102%), and 55% met or exceeded the target. Source: OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/expectmore/detail/10002335.2004.html.

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (2005): All States meet the TANF all-families work participation rate of 50% (including the caseload reduction credit).; promised 100%, actual 98% (98% of target); unit: %. Source: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/expectmore/detail/10003502.2005.html

8 of 10 matched precedent programs shown, largest first.

Target-setting language with precedent

Each item comes from one funder, one program or one department; none is a government-wide rule.

Showing clauses from HHS.

CDC DP-23-0002 applicant FAQ (2023): Quote: “you may enter a '0' and then TBD for targets in the work plan” — https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/healthyschools/nofo/nofo.htm
SAMHSA CMHS Infrastructure, Prevention and Promotion Overview Guide, v2.0, p. 9 (2022): Quote: “grantees can revise annual goals in consultation with their GPO during the first quarter of each fiscal year” — https://spars.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/OE%20SPARS%20CMHS%20IPP%20Overview%20Guide.pdf
HRSA-26-057 ECCS SEED applicant FAQs, p. 6 (2026): Paraphrase: Baseline estimates are confirmed or updated within six months of award. — https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/45e009d7-46ed-482f-8aa7-02812f207f71/attachments/54ad1b19-2651-43c7-8ade-76203c7770d7/HRSA-26-057_ECCS_SEED_Applicant_FAQs.pdf
NIH PAR-25-383, Section VI (2025): Paraphrase: Future-year milestones may be renegotiated based on prior-year data. — https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-25-383.html
Arizona Rural Health Transformation, approved program narrative, pp. 20-22 (2026): Paraphrase: A baseline assessment is done after award, and targets are set from it. — https://www.azahcccs.gov/AHCCCS/Downloads/Initiatives/RHTP/Arizona%27sApprovedProgramNarrative.pdf
HRSA Health Center Program (H80) patient targets, Primary Health Care Digest (2022): Quote: “confirm or request adjustment to their patient target by the deadline in their email” — https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USHHSHRSA/bulletins/3120df3

What reviewers penalize

These ten weaknesses recur in 17 published reviewer critiques, mostly U.S. Department of Education and NIH. The count is the number of critiques that name it, not a rate, and a reviewer comment is a judgment.

Attrition or missing-data handling left unresolved (named in 7 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “the applicant did not address how missing data will be handled” U.S. Department of Education, Education Innovation and Research (EIR) Mid-Phase, WestEd, S411B220027, 2022, Technical Review Form, pp. 25, 29. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2022/12/S411B220027_WestEd_TRF.pdf#page=29
Comparisons vulnerable to selection, contamination, baseline differences or incompatible data (named in 7 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “may require additional interpretation” National Institutes of Health, NIAID, K01 AI131895 (Rebeiro, Vanderbilt), applicant-authorized summary statement; a research application, pp. 5-6. https://beta.nih.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_media/2026-09/k01-rebeiro-summary-statement.pdf#page=6
Feasibility assumptions or fallback arrangements unsupported (named in 6 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “no alternative analysis plan is provided” National Institutes of Health, NIDCD, R01 DC017174 (Heinemann and Cherney), applicant-authorized summary statement; a research application, pp. 3, 5-6. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/sanitized-heinemann-cherney-summary-statement-redacted.pdf#page=5
Implementation fidelity, thresholds or mediators inadequately specified (named in 5 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “Mediators are not described.” U.S. Department of Education, EIR Early-Phase, Education Development Center, U411C190275, 2019, Technical Review Form, p. 4. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2019/11/U411C190275-Education-Development-Center-Inc.-TRF-Tier-2.pdf#page=4
Measurement tools insufficiently identified, supported or protected against reporting bias (named in 4 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “no detail is provided” U.S. Department of Education, EIR Mid-Phase, Niswonger Foundation, U411B170038, 2017, Technical Review Form, pp. 4-5. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2016/12/U411B170038_TRF.pdf#page=4
Targets or success criteria missing, inconsistent or disconnected from the project (named in 4 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “lacks a specific number” U.S. Department of Education, EIR Mid-Phase, ASSISTments Foundation, S411B220024, 2022, Technical Review Form, p. 14. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2022/12/S411B220024_ASSISTments-Foundation-Inc_TRF.pdf#page=14
Analysis procedures insufficiently specified for the stated questions or model (named in 4 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “methods of data analysis are not adequately described” National Institutes of Health, NIAID, R01 AI098472 renewal (Gandhi, UCSF), applicant-authorized summary statement; a research application, pp. 4-5. https://beta.nih.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_media/2026-09/2-R01-AI098472-06_Ganhdi_Summary.pdf#page=4
Data protection, management or cross-site coordination incomplete (named in 3 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “The data management plan stops midsentence on page 125” National Institutes of Health, NIDCD, R01 DC017683 (Gifford and Camarata, Vanderbilt), applicant-authorized summary statement; a research application, pp. 9-10. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/sanitized-giffordcamarataapplicationsummary-dc017683-01a1.pdf#page=10
Feedback collection lacks a specified route into program decisions (named in 2 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “The applicant does not discuss how often the team will review data or implement changes.” U.S. Department of Education, EIR Early-Phase, Orange County Superintendent of Schools, S411C200130, 2020, Technical Review Form, pp. 16, 19. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2020/12/S411C200130-Orange-County-Superintendent-of-Schools-TRF.pdf#page=19
Evaluator independence insufficiently explained (named in 1 of 17 critiques). Reviewers wrote: “The level of independence is not made clear” U.S. Department of Education, EIR Early-Phase, Research Triangle Institute, S411C220065, 2022, Technical Review Form, pp. 24-25. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/2022/12/S411C220065_Research-Triangle-Institute-_TRF.pdf#page=24

Protocol skeleton

Draft text, edit before use

Measures: Number of jobs created to increase opportunities for people with low incomes in the identified community.; Number of job opportunities maintained in the identified community.; Number of “living wage ” jobs created in the identified community*.; Number of “living wage” jobs maintained in the identified community*.; Number of jobs created in the identified community with a benefit package.; Other Counts of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z); Percent decrease of the unemployment rate.; Percent decrease of the youth unemployment rate.; Percent decrease of the underemployment rate.; Other Rates of Change for Employment Indicators (CNPI 1z); Number of accessible and affordable early childhood or pre-school education assets or resources added to the identified community.; Number of accredited or licensed affordable child care facilities added in the identified community.; and 3 more listed above. Baseline: ____ months from award, using CSBG Annual Report v2.1 (OMB-approved information collection, reginfo.gov objectID 171328201). Targets: set from the observed baseline at month ____, or committed now as a change of ____ percentage points from baseline.

Missing-data plan (how dropout and missing observations will be handled): ____

Comparison group or baseline (what you compare against and how the groups started): ____

Fallback if recruitment, data access or the first analysis falls short: ____

Fidelity threshold (what counts as full implementation, and how it is measured): ____

Instrument named, with its validity evidence and its rights (license) status: ____

Numeric target for each measure (a number, not a direction): ____

Analysis for each outcome (method, comparison, adjustment): ____

Data protection and data management (who holds identifiable data, where, for how long): ____

Feedback schedule (who reviews the data, how often, and what changes as a result): ____

Evaluator role and independence (who evaluates and how they are separate from delivery): ____

The text is copied or summarized from public documents. It is not legal advice.