Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (DOJ OJP) / Court Appointed Special Advocate Training, Technical Assistance and Subgrants Program

Measure 922

How many state organizations and local programs received a mandatory accreditation review during this reporting period to ensure compliance with national standards?

RequiredoutputFY2026Q8

Tier 1: Collect today

A count of services or people, held in the organization’s own records.

Mandatory accreditation review m eans the m ember pr ogram completed a comprehensive review to ensure they meet strict organizational and operational standards and provide high quality, best interest advocacy for children. This process includes rigorous self-assessment, peer review, and verification of compliance with core standards—covering volunteer screening, training, supervision, and financial and organizational management—to maintain active network status. Reporting period is the specific timeframe covered by this report. National standards refers to the documented standards for state or local CASA/GAL organizations that define the operational framework, focusing on core model adherence and continuous high-quality advocacy.

Target
No target rule stated
Source document

Grantee precedent for this measure

No precedent measure is paired with this one. Pairs require equal names or a written alias, and the same agency.