Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / U.S. Department of Education, Federal TRIO Programs / TRIO Student Support Services

Measure 4088

Table 4, Efficiency gap [1]

Requiredother2023-24

Tier not determined

No rule matched this measure, so no tier is guessed.

Instrument
TRIO Student Support Services grantee-level GPRA data tables (workbook)
Target
No target rule stated
Source document, sheet 'Table 4 Efficiency', column M (2023-24 workbook)

Grantee precedent for this measure

30 paired precedent measures, first 8 shown, closest first. Pairing basis is shown on each.

Table 4, Efficiency gap (1)

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 1,160 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2022-23–#####$–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–98$–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–#####$–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2022-23–784$–document
Abilene Christian University2022-23–339$–document
Adams State University2022-23–335$–document
Adirondack Community College2022-23–320$–document
Adrian College2022-23–420$–document
Aims Community College2022-23–#####$–document
Aims Community College2022-23–#####$–document

Percentage of SSS participants persisting at the same institution.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 7 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result717107%105% to 107%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

7 shown

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2000

    67.0 → 67 (100% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2001

    67.0 → 70 (104% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2002

    67.0 → 72 (107% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2003

    68.0 → 72 (106% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2004

    68.5 → 73.1 (107% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2005

    69.0 → 74.1 (107% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2006

    72.0 → 79.1 (110% of target) · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 7 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200067.067%100%document
TRIO Student Support Services200167.070%104%document
TRIO Student Support Services200267.072%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200368.072%106%document
TRIO Student Support Services200468.573.1%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200569.074.1%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200672.079.1%110%document

Table 4, Efficiency gap [1]

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 999 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–107$–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2023-24–788$–document
Abilene Christian University2023-24–41$–document
Adams State University2023-24–392$–document
Adirondack Community College2023-24–544$–document
Adrian College2023-24–265$–document
Alamance Community College2023-24–354$–document
Albion College2023-24–256$–document
Allan Hancock Community College2023-24–67$–document
Allegany College/ Maryland2023-24–166$–document

Percentage of SSS freshmen at 4-year institutions completing a Bachelors degree at original institution within 6 years.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 3 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result111120%120% to 120%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

3 shown

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2006

    28.0 → 33.5 (120% of target) · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2004

    N/A → 28.1 · %

    Source document

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2005

    N/A → 29.4 · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 3 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200628.033.5%120%document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A28.1%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A29.4%–document

Table 4, Efficiency gap (2)

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 1,160 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2022-23–#####$–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–98$–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–#####$–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2022-23–857$–document
Abilene Christian University2022-23–339$–document
Adams State University2022-23–335$–document
Adirondack Community College2022-23–320$–document
Adrian College2022-23–420$–document
Aims Community College2022-23–#####$–document
Aims Community College2022-23–95$–document

The gap between the cost per successful outcome and the cost per program participant.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 4 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

4 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 4 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services2003N/A$263$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A$252$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A$245$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2006NA$209$–document

Table 4, Efficiency gap [2]

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 1,014 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–107$–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2023-24–873$–document
Abilene Christian University2023-24–41$–document
Adams State University2023-24–392$–document
Adirondack Community College2023-24–567$–document
Adrian College2023-24–265$–document
Alamance Community College2023-24–377$–document
Albion College2023-24–256$–document
Allan Hancock Community College2023-24–79$–document
Allegany College/ Maryland2023-24–287$–document

The percentage of SSS freshmen at 2-year institutions completing an Associates degree at original institution or transferring to a 4-year institution within 3 years.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 6 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result11191%91% to 91%0%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

6 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 6 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200627.024.6%91%document
TRIO Student Support Services2001N/A23.1%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2002N/A26%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2003N/A27.7%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A25.6%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A24.5%–document