Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / U.S. Department of Education, Federal TRIO Programs / TRIO Student Support Services

Measure 4069

Table 3, Associate degree completion and/or transfer rate

Requiredoutcome2022-23

Tier 1: Collect todayTier 3: Needs a partner

The outcome sits in a record another agency holds. You hold the participant list and count it.

You count your own participants; the school or district record confirms the outcome.

Partner routes for school records
  • WA: school attendance, grades, credits and graduation progress Held by Seattle Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA consent, 34 CFR 99.30, or an approved school-official arrangement under 34 CFR 99.31(a)(1)(i)(B); district DSA, authorized student list and required consent or approved exemption.
    Lag
    Event lag NR; automated files are contemplated. Processing: approximately 2-3 weeks, rising to 4-6 weeks after December 2026.
    Cost
    The standard DSA states no payments under the agreement.
    Who may request
    Approved community-based partners meeting district criteria and completing agreement and training requirements.
  • CA: student achievement and longitudinal education outcomes Held by California Department of Education, including CALPADS and assessment records.
    Rule
    Approved work for or on behalf of CDE under FERPA's studies exception, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6), or applicable audit and evaluation provisions, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(3) and 99.35; concept review and MOU.
    Lag
    Data-year and event lag NR; availability depends on collections and requested linkage.
    Cost
    Published charges include $85 per hour staff; $500 initial support for 60 days; $220 per hour legal; $200 executive processing.
    Who may request
    Qualified university or nonprofit researchers and organizations conducting an eligible CDE-approved study or evaluation; ordinary grant reporting alone does not establish eligibility.
  • NY: graduation and postsecondary enrollment and persistence; other approved school outcomes Held by New York City Public Schools; approved administrative datasets.
    Rule
    Research Review process, project-specific DSA, and a qualifying FERPA basis such as 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6) for an eligible study. Nonprofit status alone is insufficient.
    Lag
    Annual files; attendance also has monthly files. Fixed event-to-extract lag NR.
    Cost
    NR.
    Who may request
    Approved external researchers and organizations with an accepted project and disclosure basis.
  • IL: attendance, GPA, credits and graduation Held by Chicago Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA plus CPS's stricter local policy: student-level requests without active parental consent will be denied. External administrative-data request through IRBManager; a federal exception does not override CPS's policy.
    Lag
    Event lag NR. Processing: approximately 30 days to respond, then another 30 days to fulfill an approved request.
    Cost
    Secondary-extract fee NR. A $50 RRB proposal fee applies when that separate research-review process is required.
    Who may request
    CPS partners, including program providers seeking funding continuation or program evaluation, and approved researchers.
Caveats
  • FERPA's studies exception has three purposes and needs a written agreement. FERPA's studies exception has three purposes: developing, validating or administering predictive tests; administering student aid; or improving instruction. It requires a written agreement specifying purpose, use and destruction. The school-official exception instead requires an outsourced institutional function, direct district control, and use and redisclosure restrictions. A nonprofit's desire to report grant outcomes does not, by itself, satisfy either exception. Source
Agreement templates
Instrument
TRIO Student Support Services grantee-level GPRA data tables (workbook)
Target
No target rule stated
Source document, sheet 'Table 3 Completion 2-year', column G (2022-23 workbook)

Grantee precedent for this measure

30 paired precedent measures, first 8 shown, closest first. Pairing basis is shown on each.

Table 3, Associate degree completion and/or transfer rate

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 607 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Aaniiih Nakoda College · 2022-23

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Adirondack Community College · 2022-23

    Result 45% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aims Community College · 2022-23

    Result <=50% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aims Community College · 2022-23

    Result 33% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alabama Southern Community College · 2022-23

    Result 50% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamance Community College · 2022-23

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Allan Hancock Community College · 2022-23

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Allegany College/ Maryland · 2022-23

    Result 53% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Amarillo College · 2022-23

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Amarillo College/ West · 2022-23

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Aaniiih Nakoda College2022-23–#####rate (fraction)–document
Adirondack Community College2022-23–45%rate (fraction)–document
Aims Community College2022-23–<=50%rate (fraction)–document
Aims Community College2022-23–33%rate (fraction)–document
Alabama Southern Community College2022-23–50%rate (fraction)–document
Alamance Community College2022-23–#####rate (fraction)–document
Allan Hancock Community College2022-23–#####rate (fraction)–document
Allegany College/ Maryland2022-23–53%rate (fraction)–document
Amarillo College2022-23–#####rate (fraction)–document
Amarillo College/ West2022-23–—rate (fraction)–document

The percentage of SSS freshmen at 2-year institutions completing an Associates degree at original institution or transferring to a 4-year institution within 3 years.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 6 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result11191%91% to 91%0%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

6 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 6 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200627.024.6%91%document
TRIO Student Support Services2001N/A23.1%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2002N/A26%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2003N/A27.7%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A25.6%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A24.5%–document

Table 3, Associate degree completion and/or transfer rate (2)

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 605 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Aaniiih Nakoda College · 2023-24

    Result >50% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Adirondack Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.66 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aims Community College · 2023-24

    Result <=35% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aims Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.64 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamance Community College · 2023-24

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Allan Hancock Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.48 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Allegany College/ Maryland · 2023-24

    Result 0.44 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Amarillo College · 2023-24

    Result 0.69 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Amarillo College/ West · 2023-24

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • American River College · 2023-24

    Result >=65% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Aaniiih Nakoda College2023-24–>50%rate (fraction)–document
Adirondack Community College2023-24–0.66rate (fraction)–document
Aims Community College2023-24–<=35%rate (fraction)–document
Aims Community College2023-24–0.64rate (fraction)–document
Alamance Community College2023-24–#####rate (fraction)–document
Allan Hancock Community College2023-24–0.48rate (fraction)–document
Allegany College/ Maryland2023-24–0.44rate (fraction)–document
Amarillo College2023-24–0.69rate (fraction)–document
Amarillo College/ West2023-24–#####rate (fraction)–document
American River College2023-24–>=65%rate (fraction)–document

The gap between the cost per successful outcome and the cost per program participant.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 4 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

4 shown

Example rows (results with a target first), 4 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services2003N/A$263$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A$252$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A$245$–document
TRIO Student Support Services2006NA$209$–document

Table 2, Bachelor's degree completion rate

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 1,100 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University · 2022-23

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University · 2023-24

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2022-23

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2022-23

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2023-24

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2023-24

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Abilene Christian University · 2022-23

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Abilene Christian University · 2023-24

    Result — · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Adams State University · 2022-23

    Result 41% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Adams State University · 2023-24

    Result 0.4 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2022-23–—rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2023-24–—rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–—rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–—rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–—rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–—rate (fraction)–document
Abilene Christian University2022-23–—rate (fraction)–document
Abilene Christian University2023-24–—rate (fraction)–document
Adams State University2022-23–41%rate (fraction)–document
Adams State University2023-24–0.4rate (fraction)–document

Percentage of SSS freshmen at 4-year institutions completing a Bachelors degree at original institution within 6 years.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 3 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result111120%120% to 120%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

3 shown

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2006

    28.0 → 33.5 (120% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2004

    N/A → 28.1 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2005

    N/A → 29.4 · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 3 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200628.033.5%120%document
TRIO Student Support Services2004N/A28.1%–document
TRIO Student Support Services2005N/A29.4%–document

Table 1, Persistence rate

TRIO Student Support Services, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 2,314 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University · 2022-23

    Result >=65% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University · 2023-24

    Result >=75% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2022-23

    Result >=75% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2022-23

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2023-24

    Result >=80% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity · 2023-24

    Result ##### · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aaniiih Nakoda College · 2022-23

    Result >=60% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Aaniiih Nakoda College · 2023-24

    Result >=65% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Abilene Christian University · 2022-23

    Result 71% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Abilene Christian University · 2023-24

    Result >=60% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2022-23–>=65%rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University2023-24–>=75%rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–>=75%rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2022-23–#####rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–>=80%rate (fraction)–document
AZ Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State Univsersity2023-24–#####rate (fraction)–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2022-23–>=60%rate (fraction)–document
Aaniiih Nakoda College2023-24–>=65%rate (fraction)–document
Abilene Christian University2022-23–71%rate (fraction)–document
Abilene Christian University2023-24–>=60%rate (fraction)–document

Percentage of SSS participants persisting at the same institution.

TRIO Student Support Services, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 7 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result717107%105% to 107%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

7 shown

  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2000

    67.0 → 67 (100% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2001

    67.0 → 70 (104% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2002

    67.0 → 72 (107% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2003

    68.0 → 72 (106% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2004

    68.5 → 73.1 (107% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2005

    69.0 → 74.1 (107% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Student Support Services · 2006

    72.0 → 79.1 (110% of target) · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 7 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Student Support Services200067.067%100%document
TRIO Student Support Services200167.070%104%document
TRIO Student Support Services200267.072%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200368.072%106%document
TRIO Student Support Services200468.573.1%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200569.074.1%107%document
TRIO Student Support Services200672.079.1%110%document