Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / U.S. Department of Education, Federal TRIO Programs / TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers

Measure 4035

Table 2, Postsecondary enrollment (4) rate

Requiredoutcome2023-24

Tier 1: Collect todayTier 3: Needs a partner

The outcome sits in a record another agency holds. You hold the participant list and count it.

You count your own participants; the school or district record confirms the outcome.

Partner routes for school records
  • WA: school attendance, grades, credits and graduation progress Held by Seattle Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA consent, 34 CFR 99.30, or an approved school-official arrangement under 34 CFR 99.31(a)(1)(i)(B); district DSA, authorized student list and required consent or approved exemption.
    Lag
    Event lag NR; automated files are contemplated. Processing: approximately 2-3 weeks, rising to 4-6 weeks after December 2026.
    Cost
    The standard DSA states no payments under the agreement.
    Who may request
    Approved community-based partners meeting district criteria and completing agreement and training requirements.
  • CA: student achievement and longitudinal education outcomes Held by California Department of Education, including CALPADS and assessment records.
    Rule
    Approved work for or on behalf of CDE under FERPA's studies exception, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6), or applicable audit and evaluation provisions, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(3) and 99.35; concept review and MOU.
    Lag
    Data-year and event lag NR; availability depends on collections and requested linkage.
    Cost
    Published charges include $85 per hour staff; $500 initial support for 60 days; $220 per hour legal; $200 executive processing.
    Who may request
    Qualified university or nonprofit researchers and organizations conducting an eligible CDE-approved study or evaluation; ordinary grant reporting alone does not establish eligibility.
  • NY: graduation and postsecondary enrollment and persistence; other approved school outcomes Held by New York City Public Schools; approved administrative datasets.
    Rule
    Research Review process, project-specific DSA, and a qualifying FERPA basis such as 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6) for an eligible study. Nonprofit status alone is insufficient.
    Lag
    Annual files; attendance also has monthly files. Fixed event-to-extract lag NR.
    Cost
    NR.
    Who may request
    Approved external researchers and organizations with an accepted project and disclosure basis.
  • IL: attendance, GPA, credits and graduation Held by Chicago Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA plus CPS's stricter local policy: student-level requests without active parental consent will be denied. External administrative-data request through IRBManager; a federal exception does not override CPS's policy.
    Lag
    Event lag NR. Processing: approximately 30 days to respond, then another 30 days to fulfill an approved request.
    Cost
    Secondary-extract fee NR. A $50 RRB proposal fee applies when that separate research-review process is required.
    Who may request
    CPS partners, including program providers seeking funding continuation or program evaluation, and approved researchers.
Caveats
  • FERPA's studies exception has three purposes and needs a written agreement. FERPA's studies exception has three purposes: developing, validating or administering predictive tests; administering student aid; or improving instruction. It requires a written agreement specifying purpose, use and destruction. The school-official exception instead requires an outsourced institutional function, direct district control, and use and redisclosure restrictions. A nonprofit's desire to report grant outcomes does not, by itself, satisfy either exception. Source
Agreement templates
Instrument
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers grantee-level GPRA data tables (workbook)
Target
No target rule stated
Source document, sheet 'Table 2 - Enrollment by Sector', column G (2023-24 workbook)

Grantee precedent for this measure

26 paired precedent measures, first 8 shown, closest first. Pairing basis is shown on each.

Table 2, Postsecondary enrollment (4) rate

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 180 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2023-24

    Result 0.62 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2023-24

    Result 0.46 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2023-24

    Result 0.1 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2023-24

    Result 0.58 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2023-24

    Result 0.51 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2023-24

    Result 0.53 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.55 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.76 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.48 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.57 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2023-24–0.62rate (fraction)–document
Alamo Colleges District2023-24–0.46rate (fraction)–document
Applied Information Management Institute2023-24–0.1rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2023-24–0.58rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2023-24–0.51rate (fraction)–document
Austin Peay State University2023-24–0.53rate (fraction)–document
Barton County Community College2023-24–0.55rate (fraction)–document
Baton Rouge Community College2023-24–0.76rate (fraction)–document
Bevill State Community College2023-24–0.48rate (fraction)–document
Big Bend Community College2023-24–0.57rate (fraction)–document

The percentage of participants enrolling in college.

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 7 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result313101%100% to 101%67%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

7 shown

  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2004

    57.0 → 57.4 (101% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2005

    57.5 → 56.9 (99% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2006

    58.0 → 58.4 (101% of target) · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2000

    NA → 57 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2001

    NA → 66 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2002

    NA → 66 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2003

    NA → 56 · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 7 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers200457.057.4%101%document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers200557.556.9%99%document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers200658.058.4%101%document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2000NA57%–document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2001NA66%–document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2002NA66%–document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2003NA56%–document

Table 2, Postsecondary enrollment rate

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 183 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2022-23

    Result 49% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2022-23

    Result 47% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2022-23

    Result 17% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2022-23

    Result 69% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2022-23

    Result 50% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2022-23

    Result 45% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2022-23

    Result 52% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2022-23

    Result 72% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2022-23

    Result 56% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2022-23

    Result 53% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2022-23–49%rate (fraction)–document
Alamo Colleges District2022-23–47%rate (fraction)–document
Applied Information Management Institute2022-23–17%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2022-23–69%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2022-23–50%rate (fraction)–document
Austin Peay State University2022-23–45%rate (fraction)–document
Barton County Community College2022-23–52%rate (fraction)–document
Baton Rouge Community College2022-23–72%rate (fraction)–document
Bevill State Community College2022-23–56%rate (fraction)–document
Big Bend Community College2022-23–53%rate (fraction)–document

Percent of participants that are both low-income and potential first-generation college students.

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by name_equal. 3 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

3 shown

  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2004

    NA → 75.1 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2005

    NA → 74.6 · %

    Source document
  • TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers · 2006

    NA → 74.2 · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 3 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2004NA75.1%–document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2005NA74.6%–document
TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers2006NA74.2%–document

Table 1, Low-income, potential first-generation college students served: (4) Rate

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 180 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2023-24

    Result 0.86 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2023-24

    Result 0.71 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2023-24

    Result 0.67 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2023-24

    Result 0.77 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2023-24

    Result 0.86 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2023-24

    Result 0.68 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.7 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.96 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.68 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2023-24

    Result 0.64 · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2023-24–0.86rate (fraction)–document
Alamo Colleges District2023-24–0.71rate (fraction)–document
Applied Information Management Institute2023-24–0.67rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2023-24–0.77rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2023-24–0.86rate (fraction)–document
Austin Peay State University2023-24–0.68rate (fraction)–document
Barton County Community College2023-24–0.7rate (fraction)–document
Baton Rouge Community College2023-24–0.96rate (fraction)–document
Bevill State Community College2023-24–0.68rate (fraction)–document
Big Bend Community College2023-24–0.64rate (fraction)–document

Table 2, College-ready participants served

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 183 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2022-23

    Result 383 · count

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2022-23

    Result 431 · count

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2022-23

    Result 343 · count

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2022-23

    Result 658 · count

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2022-23

    Result 1000 · count

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2022-23

    Result 460 · count

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2022-23

    Result 545 · count

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2022-23

    Result 350 · count

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2022-23

    Result 365 · count

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2022-23

    Result 487 · count

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2022-23–383count–document
Alamo Colleges District2022-23–431count–document
Applied Information Management Institute2022-23–343count–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2022-23–658count–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2022-23–1000count–document
Austin Peay State University2022-23–460count–document
Barton County Community College2022-23–545count–document
Baton Rouge Community College2022-23–350count–document
Bevill State Community College2022-23–365count–document
Big Bend Community College2022-23–487count–document

Table 2, PSE distribution by level of first postsecondary institution attended: Unknown

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 183 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2022-23

    Result <=5% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2022-23

    Result <=10% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2022-23

    Result 11% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2022-23

    Result <=5% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2022-23

    Result 0% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2022-23–<=5%rate (fraction)–document
Alamo Colleges District2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document
Applied Information Management Institute2022-23–<=10%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2022-23–11%rate (fraction)–document
Austin Peay State University2022-23–<=5%rate (fraction)–document
Barton County Community College2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document
Baton Rouge Community College2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document
Bevill State Community College2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document
Big Bend Community College2022-23–0%rate (fraction)–document

Table 2, PSE distribution by level of first postsecondary institution attended: Four-year

TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers, ED Federal TRIO grantee-level GPRA tables

Paired by name_equal. 183 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

10 shown

  • Academic Institute of Central Carolina · 2022-23

    Result 6% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Alamo Colleges District · 2022-23

    Result 20% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Applied Information Management Institute · 2022-23

    Result 18% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas Northeastern College · 2022-23

    Result 14% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Arkansas State University/ Mid-South · 2022-23

    Result 29% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Austin Peay State University · 2022-23

    Result 74% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Barton County Community College · 2022-23

    Result 23% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Baton Rouge Community College · 2022-23

    Result 12% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Bevill State Community College · 2022-23

    Result 5% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
  • Big Bend Community College · 2022-23

    Result 15% · rate (fraction)

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 10 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
Academic Institute of Central Carolina2022-23–6%rate (fraction)–document
Alamo Colleges District2022-23–20%rate (fraction)–document
Applied Information Management Institute2022-23–18%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas Northeastern College2022-23–14%rate (fraction)–document
Arkansas State University/ Mid-South2022-23–29%rate (fraction)–document
Austin Peay State University2022-23–74%rate (fraction)–document
Barton County Community College2022-23–23%rate (fraction)–document
Baton Rouge Community College2022-23–12%rate (fraction)–document
Bevill State Community College2022-23–5%rate (fraction)–document
Big Bend Community College2022-23–15%rate (fraction)–document