Skip to content
Grant Precedent

Match / U.S. Department of Education / Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities (OSEP)

Measure 4012

The percentage of scholars who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance.

Program-wideoutcomeMeasure 3

Tier 1: Collect todayTier 3: Needs a partner

The outcome sits in a record another agency holds. You hold the participant list and count it.

You count your own participants; the school or district record confirms the outcome.

Partner routes for school records
  • WA: school attendance, grades, credits and graduation progress Held by Seattle Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA consent, 34 CFR 99.30, or an approved school-official arrangement under 34 CFR 99.31(a)(1)(i)(B); district DSA, authorized student list and required consent or approved exemption.
    Lag
    Event lag NR; automated files are contemplated. Processing: approximately 2-3 weeks, rising to 4-6 weeks after December 2026.
    Cost
    The standard DSA states no payments under the agreement.
    Who may request
    Approved community-based partners meeting district criteria and completing agreement and training requirements.
  • CA: student achievement and longitudinal education outcomes Held by California Department of Education, including CALPADS and assessment records.
    Rule
    Approved work for or on behalf of CDE under FERPA's studies exception, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6), or applicable audit and evaluation provisions, 34 CFR 99.31(a)(3) and 99.35; concept review and MOU.
    Lag
    Data-year and event lag NR; availability depends on collections and requested linkage.
    Cost
    Published charges include $85 per hour staff; $500 initial support for 60 days; $220 per hour legal; $200 executive processing.
    Who may request
    Qualified university or nonprofit researchers and organizations conducting an eligible CDE-approved study or evaluation; ordinary grant reporting alone does not establish eligibility.
  • NY: graduation and postsecondary enrollment and persistence; other approved school outcomes Held by New York City Public Schools; approved administrative datasets.
    Rule
    Research Review process, project-specific DSA, and a qualifying FERPA basis such as 34 CFR 99.31(a)(6) for an eligible study. Nonprofit status alone is insufficient.
    Lag
    Annual files; attendance also has monthly files. Fixed event-to-extract lag NR.
    Cost
    NR.
    Who may request
    Approved external researchers and organizations with an accepted project and disclosure basis.
  • IL: attendance, GPA, credits and graduation Held by Chicago Public Schools.
    Rule
    FERPA plus CPS's stricter local policy: student-level requests without active parental consent will be denied. External administrative-data request through IRBManager; a federal exception does not override CPS's policy.
    Lag
    Event lag NR. Processing: approximately 30 days to respond, then another 30 days to fulfill an approved request.
    Cost
    Secondary-extract fee NR. A $50 RRB proposal fee applies when that separate research-review process is required.
    Who may request
    CPS partners, including program providers seeking funding continuation or program evaluation, and approved researchers.
Caveats
  • FERPA's studies exception has three purposes and needs a written agreement. FERPA's studies exception has three purposes: developing, validating or administering predictive tests; administering student aid; or improving instruction. It requires a written agreement specifying purpose, use and destruction. The school-official exception instead requires an outsourced institutional function, direct district control, and use and redisclosure restrictions. A nonprofit's desire to report grant outcomes does not, by itself, satisfy either exception. Source
Agreement templates
Instrument
OSEP Personnel Development Program Data Collection System (PDPDCS)
Target
No target rule stated
Source document, HTML section 'Program Performance Measures'

Grantee precedent for this measure

5 paired precedent measures. Pairing basis is shown on each.

Percentage of scholars who exit training programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

Attainment (result ÷ promised) by kind of promised value
Promised value isResultsGranteesPeriodsMedianMiddle halfAt or above target
target printed beside the result111170%170% to 170%100%
0%target200%+

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    1% → 1.7% (170% of target) · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    n/a → 1.3% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants20061%1.7%%170%document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005n/a1.3%%–document

Percentage of funds expended on scholars who drop out of programs because of: 1) poor academic performance; and 2) scholarship support being terminated when the federal grant to their institution ends.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2003

    n/a → 5% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    n/a → 0.29% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2003n/a5%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006n/a0.29%%–document

Percentage of degree/certification recipients who are working in the area(s) for which they were trained upon program completion.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 5 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

5 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2002

    n/a → 55.4% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2003

    n/a → 57.8% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2004

    n/a → 62.8% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    n/a → 63.1% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    n/a → 59.1% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 5 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2002n/a55.4%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2003n/a57.8%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2004n/a62.8%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005n/a63.1%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006n/a59.1%%–document

Percentage of projects that incorporate scientifically- or evidence-based practices.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 2 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

2 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2005

    Baseline → 68% · %

    Source document
  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    Baseline → 41.5% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 2 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2005Baseline68%%–document
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006Baseline41.5%%–document

Percentage of scholars completing IDEA-funded training programs who are knowledgeable and skilled in scientifically- or evidence-based practices for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities.

IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants, OMB PART assessments (ExpectMore.gov archive)

Paired by alias (IDEA Part D personnel development, the same OSEP personnel preparation program). 1 rows in the source.

No rows for this measure carry both a promised value and a result, so no attainment is computed.

Example rows (results with a target first)

1 shown

  • IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants · 2006

    Baseline → 91% · %

    Source document
Example rows (results with a target first), 1 shown
GranteePeriodPromisedActualUnit% of targetSource
IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants2006Baseline91%%–document